Quote:
Originally Posted by Billv
Not necessarily, scandinavians from memory have over 20% GST and other EU countries have higher as well so there is room to move
|
Just because somewhere already has higher taxes doesn't mean that people didn't leave that country as taxes were rising.
Also just because a country is worse doesn't make the country raising taxes still attractive. The propensity to relocate in the presence of taxes would have more to do with the margin between the taxation in an individuals country versus the taxation level of a low tax economy of similar living standards.
So for example if Australia's top tax bracket was to go to up 10% but NZ's also went up 10% Australians might not chose to leave Australia for NZ though they might chose to move to Singapore or Hong Kong if their tax rates stayed the same given then the marginal difference between those developed economies tax rates and Australia's increased by 10%.
Also there is another major problem that has been spawning in many developed economies of late in response to high taxes, that is tax evasion. Tax evasion increases dramatically as tax rates increase. So people begin to engage in cash based transactions, bartering of goods and services or alternative forms of currency in a bid to avoid tax. This seems to be quite an increasing trend in the US of late.
My point simply is that increasing taxation will help with sovereign debt problems, but it's not a simple case of jack up tax rates and expect citizens to cop it on the chin. At the end of the day solving the problem will also have to focus on reducing government spending - which is something that would be disastrous for many economies right now.
Like for example the US private sector is still shedding thousands of jobs every month, but in recent months these job losses in the private sector are largely being offset but the growth in public sector jobs. Now if the markets were to reassess the US's sovereign risk and to conclude that US government needs to start implementing a plan of fiscal discipline to get back to a balanced budget (which they presently don't forecast they can achieve for at least the next decade) would mean the government also would have to start shedding jobs - this of course would sending the US back into recession and unemployment would once again start spiralling up.
|