Dr Lobster
Yes DFA insist that one uses an advisor who is trained / up to date in the theory behind DFA and the academic material to support it. It is one way for the fund not to have investors buying and selling all the time, reducing the overall efficiency of the fund.
Look for a fee for service financial planner with no vested interests to taking commissions. There are only a handful in australia
Interview a few of them and see who you like. Thats how I did it.
A planner would have a good idea on the tax side of super and keep up to date - which is something that keeps on changing
Because minimum is 1million - you need wrap to get in
But a lot of advisors can get huge discounts on wraps if they are with a large firm, and get discounts on margin loans.
Explaining alpha
now thats a hard question given that I have not studied the mathematics behind this concept properly
From around the web the best one liners I can find are
"Alpha" is the amount of money you make at the expense of other investors. "Beta" is the amount of money everyone makes due to the return of the market itself.
from Travis Morien - die hards forum
http://www.ilukacg.com/articles/Tao%20of%20Alpha.pdf
If the total market return per unit of risk were a pie, beta would be an investor’s fair share and
alpha would be extra pieces—or bites or crumbs—taken from others.
|