|
Welcome to InvestEd.
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please:
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.
|
what to do with money-becoming rich
18-08-2008, 03:56 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
thanks, I'll have a play with those moving averages. but with a initial look, they seem to get you out to late, and in to late... thats if I'm reading it correctly.
sorry if I understand you correctly, you need to use a daily and weekly chart combined?
|
|
18-08-2008, 05:14 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by crc_error
thanks, I'll have a play with those moving averages. but with a initial look, they seem to get you out to late, and in to late... thats if I'm reading it correctly.
sorry if I understand you correctly, you need to use a daily and weekly chart combined?
|
You can always use shorter MA including Multiple MAs and/or variety of other indicators (it’s your choice).
As I said – I do not use indicators - (55/60 weekly MA is just an example).
I would say that there is always better to have something in place (like 55/60weeks MA) rather than nothing and seating on the 20%+ loss hoping for a brighter future.
Yep...First use weekly chart (trend conformation) and next use daily to tune entry/exit.
Do not be obsessed with a perfect entry/exit. 
You are not a daytrader but rather long term investor (hmmmm I may be wrong on this   ).
Trend-Following Indicator Moving Averages - StockCharts.com
“Moving averages can be effective tools to identify and confirm trend, identify support and resistance levels, and develop trading systems.
However, traders and investors should learn to identify securities that are suitable for analysis with moving averages and how this analysis should be applied.”
Also: Introduction to Technical Indicators and Oscillators - StockCharts.com
|
|
19-08-2008, 10:23 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
hi
thanks alot guys
been really helpfull
im not a big fan of school yet i am probably the most finacially independent and knowlegeable in my year
i am currently in year 10 and not sure what to do next year
should i leave school and trry to step up my import export scene
or stay in school and finish VCE
i just really don think its offering me much to tell you the truth
|
|
19-08-2008, 11:21 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dane445
or stay in school and finish VCE
i just really don think its offering me much to tell you the truth
|
One thing that education gives you is choices. If your business doesn't work out and you decide to go and get a job - it will possibly be easier for you to find a decent job if you have completed your VCE. Depends on the type of work you are likely to be looking for of course.
At the end of the day - you need to do what you are passionate about, but don't just think about the short term benefits of quitting now, think about your long term goals and whether sticking it out at school can potentially open up more doors for you in the future.
Could you get your business started in a small way while still in school without it affecting your studies too much?
__________________
Sim'
This is a general comment only and does not constitute advice. Before making financial decisions you should seek advice from a professional adviser, who can take into account your specific circumstances and investment goals.
|
|
20-08-2008, 10:01 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
If you do quit high school, you should follow it up with some tafe or other training.. not having any formal qualification may make it very hard to get a job.. should your business not work out. key is diversification, not only in investing, but as for employment as well.
|
|
20-08-2008, 10:01 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dane445
or stay in school and finish VCE
|
Mate, I will tell you - I am about the biggest opponent of formal education you're ever going to find. I personally think school is an enormous waste of time and unless you want to become a higher paid wage slave, Uni is just a waste of your time and money. At the same time, I'm glad that my accountant and solicitor didn't think the same way *wink*.
Having said that, I would stay at school and finish your VCE, unless you can find an apprenticeship or something. If I had my time over again, this is what I would have done. Maybe - if you're willing - you could get work at Hungry Jacks or Macca's working 40+ hours a week and plow most of your salary into investments. I don't know how that's going to affect your ability to run and develop your business, though.
People say that you need a good education to get ahead and have choices. Well I personally think that's nonsense. I'm a good example - I only just scraped through VCE (passed by one point, not because I didn't have the ability, cause I'm quite intelligent, it's just that I didn't give a rats), but I now have a job making more than most Uni grads ever will - without the hefty Uni fees. I also know plenty of people on 6 figure salaries who never went to Uni. It's possible to have the choices without the education. In fact I would go so far as to say that education is more likely to hold you back.
I feel that people just automatically say 'oh, you should get an education' because it's the done thing. The way I look at it is like this:
Take two people, both 16. They're about to enter Year 11. One decides to leave school, get a job at Macca's and invest as much of his earnings as possible whilst he is living at home. The other one decides to stay at school and go to Uni. His parents help him as much as they can, but any money he earns from now until he graduates Uni at 22 will go towards study.
So giving the Uni grad a chance, let's look at their situations in 10 years' time, at 26. The dropout has been investing for 10 years and really, done quite well. He's got an extensive portfolio and will be financially independent by 30 at the latest. The Uni grad, the one with all the 'choices' is working just above an entry level position making about the average wage, feeling disillusioned because he's come to realise that all the guff he's been fed about formal education is a lie, paying off his HECS bill and still saving a deposit for his first property.
Question: Who's better off in this scenario?
I posed this same scenario on SS a few years back when discussing this with people on there - all Uni grads, of course - and not a one of them answered the question. Silence speaks volumes.
Essentially, ask yourself 'What is best for me?'. Make the decision, understand the consequences of that decision and take responsibility for the outcome. It might work, it might not, but at least you gave it a go, whatever it is. You've got time on your side, kid. You might as well take some risks and jump in the deep end with a blindfold on. No remorse, no regrets!
Mark
__________________
'If you're going through hell, keep going’ - Winston Churchill
'Success is not about brilliance. Success is about perseverance. Hanging in there is of far more importance than any other single factor.' - Kristine
This is a general comment only and does not constitute advice. Before making legal or financial decisions you should seek advice from a professional adviser, who can take into account your specific circumstances and investment goals.
|
|
20-08-2008, 10:31 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Actually it's not the education that makes the difference but its the ambition.
The problem with education, as I see it, is that it can nullify ambition and worse it instills a false ambition based on the learning received.
This false ambition then becomes a straight jacket with those who are educated people constrained to try or venture into any other fields or even try anything entrepreneurial because in one way or another it doesn't line up with their 'education'. In other words they can only think in a particular stream or channel and are then blind to opportunities.
I guess the one aspect of having a good education is that you can hide more easily in a job where you can deliver mediocre results simply because the letters behind your name indicate that you should be able to do the job. the classic example is govt jobs where they ask for the world as far as qualifications to then pay lousy wages and meaningless work which just encourages a lack of performance (a vicious circle).
Personally I left school after the HSC (year 12 in todays speak)_went into the computer industry and never looked back. Ended up running my own company where we employed graduates to earn the dollars for us.
Cheers
__________________
Comments made in this post may not be relevant to your individual circumstances. If you intend making any investment, financial or taxation decision you should consult the relevant professional adviser.
|
|
20-08-2008, 11:40 AM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Laszczuk
Take two people, both 16. They're about to enter Year 11. One decides to leave school, get a job at Macca's and invest as much of his earnings as possible whilst he is living at home. The other one decides to stay at school and go to Uni. His parents help him as much as they can, but any money he earns from now until he graduates Uni at 22 will go towards study.
|
That's one point of view. The other point of view is that a career working behind the counter at Maccas would be mind-numbingly boring, intellectually berefit, soul-destroying, and about as challenging as flushing a toilet.
Some of us - ie, me - aren't driven by a relentless quest for cash and want more from life. I'll be the first to admit that my uni courses hold little relevance to "real life work", but they're not meant to, nor should they, and I wouldn't trade my time at uni for anything. Education is about teaching someone how to think, not what to think (or at least, it should be, that aspect of education was severely degraded during the previous government as they tried to turn schools into job training centres, but that's another story).
Education is about more than just racking up a list of letters after your name; if that's all someone is after then they indeed may well feel disillusioned afterwards when the year 10 dropout, who inevitably has at least 5 years in the workforce head start, appears to be financially better off. But again, that's not the point from my eyes. For me, learning is an end in itself and not merely a means to an end.
Another thing that I find interesting - and this is going to sound elitish and snobby, but it isn't - is that there is more often than not a distinction between somebody who is intelligent and someone who is intelligent and educated. I enjoy conversing with the latter; I often do not enjoy conversing with the former. A good education seems to open up the mind of people in ways that somebody who hasn't had the same experience, no matter how smart they are, rarely achieves.
So by all means leave school if you wish and start saving and investing your socks off. But that's a waste of life if you ask me. I work to live, not live to work. Maybe it'll take me a bit longer to achieve financial independence, but I'll be a lot more satisfied with my journey.
|
|
20-08-2008, 11:59 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thudd
That's one point of view. The other point of view is that a career working behind the counter at Maccas would be mind-numbingly boring, intellectually berefit, soul-destroying, and about as challenging as flushing a toilet.
|
I dunno about you, but that sums up perfectly most employment, whether you went to Uni or not. Only with Uni, you get the benefit of having a huge debt to pay off. In the scenario above, the two people have these prospects:
- one works a dreary, boring, mind numbing job for about 14 years, then has more choices than 99.9% of people at 30 have.
- the other one continues with school, leaves Uni and has a dreary, boring, mind numbing job for at least 15 years (keeping in mind he (probably) doesn't live at home anymore with the attendant expenses, has a large HECS debt to pay off as well as saving for investments) and might be able to stop working at around 40 if he's lucky. Most likely it's going to be around 45 before he has the freedom to choose.
Do you see the irony in your 'work to live, not live to work' statement here?
So one person has had the freedom we all on this forum aspire to for 10 years when the other one might achieve the same. Now I don't know about you, but that extra 10 years of freedom and choice certainly makes working a dreary, boring, mind numbing job at Macca's worth it.
Mark
__________________
'If you're going through hell, keep going’ - Winston Churchill
'Success is not about brilliance. Success is about perseverance. Hanging in there is of far more importance than any other single factor.' - Kristine
This is a general comment only and does not constitute advice. Before making legal or financial decisions you should seek advice from a professional adviser, who can take into account your specific circumstances and investment goals.
|
|
20-08-2008, 12:19 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Laszczuk
The dropout has been investing for 10 years and really, done quite well. He's got an extensive portfolio and will be financially independent by 30 at the latest.
Mark
|
Does that mean 15 years of investing is enough to make one financially independant ? (surplus money from a macca's job)
And at what level in terms of standard of living ?
Also what about say at age 60 or 70? I know that the effect of compounding will have given the dropout a very large lead, but would 25 years of higher surlpus income being invested have an impact around age 60 and after ?
Again how would the standard of living stack up against each other over the years and post retirement ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by handyandy
Actually it's not the education that makes the difference but its the ambition.
|
I agree
Quote:
Originally Posted by handyandy
The problem with education, as I see it, is that it can nullify ambition and worse it instills a false ambition based on the learning received.
This false ambition then becomes a straight jacket with those who are educated people constrained to try or venture into any other fields or even try anything entrepreneurial because in one way or another it doesn't line up with their 'education'. In other words they can only think in a particular stream or channel and are then blind to opportunities.
I guess the one aspect of having a good education is that you can hide more easily in a job where you can deliver mediocre results simply because the letters behind your name indicate that you should be able to do the job.
|
I don't agree with that. It depends on the person. A person who does a mediocre job, will do so with or without an education.
Its the same with ambition and entrepreneurial flair. Education or lack of it plays no part in it.
It all depends whether the person has the courage to take the plunge and swim. Ofcourse learning how to swim in a school would diminish the chances of drowning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by handyandy
Ended up running my own company where we employed graduates to earn the dollars for us.
|
A wise man once said 'Intelligent people work hard to achieve success, Geniuses hire intelligent people to achieve success for them' 
|
|
 |
|
|