Home | Log in | Join Now! | Blog | Contact    Subscribe to the InvestEd Blog via RSS
InvestEd :: Wealth Education for Australian Investors




Welcome to InvestEd.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please:


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

An Interest, tax deductible question.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2006, 06:48 PM   #1 (permalink)
gad
Member
 
gad's Avatar
 
Posts: 150
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canberra
An Interest, tax deductible question.

G'day

Just wondering, from a tax point of view, who is entitled to claim on the interest paid in the following situation:

1. Loan originally taken out by both husband & wife for IP.
2. Title of IP is in husbands name only. (So until now he has claimed).
3. IP is refinanced with another lender to 80% LVR interest only investment loan (loan still in both names & title still in husbands name only).
4. After paying out the original lender, the balance is used to buy
* additional * units in a managed fund in the * wife's * name.

I am unsure whether:
1. the husband would continue to claim on the interest paid
2. it would now be claimed against the wife's income
3. or would it need to be apportioned?

Your "opinion" is appreciated, thanks.
__________________
gad
gad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
   
 
Hide these adverts with a Free Membership
Old 02-02-2006, 07:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Sim
Administrator
 
Posts: 3,756
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney, NSW
It is the purpose of the loan that determines its deductibility.

In this case, the balance of the loan is used to buy managed fund units in wife's name - hence that portion of the interest is only claimable by the wife.

ie. option 3 is correct - it needs to be apportioned.
__________________
Sim'


This is a general comment only and does not constitute advice. Before making financial decisions you should seek advice from a professional adviser, who can take into account your specific circumstances and investment goals.
Sim is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2006, 06:58 AM   #3 (permalink)
gad
Member
 
gad's Avatar
 
Posts: 150
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canberra
Thanks Sim.
Much appreciated.
__________________
gad
gad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2006, 08:54 AM   #4 (permalink)
Nigel Ward
Team InvestEd
 
Posts: 1,105
Join Date: Jun 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by gad
G'day

Just wondering, from a tax point of view, who is entitled to claim on the interest paid in the following situation:

1. Loan originally taken out by both husband & wife for IP.
2. Title of IP is in husbands name only. (So until now he has claimed).
3. IP is refinanced with another lender to 80% LVR interest only investment loan (loan still in both names & title still in husbands name only).
4. After paying out the original lender, the balance is used to buy
* additional * units in a managed fund in the * wife's * name.

I am unsure whether:
1. the husband would continue to claim on the interest paid
2. it would now be claimed against the wife's income
3. or would it need to be apportioned?

Your "opinion" is appreciated, thanks.
Perhaps another option going forward might be a written partnership agreement under which the wife does a substantial amount of the work in relation to IPs eg letting, book-keeping, arranging repairs etc etc. The ATO in their rental properties booklet seem to accept this kind of arrangement allows apportionment of income on terms set out in the partnership agmt.

Nick will have some thoughts on this.

N.
__________________
Nigel


This is a general comment only and does not constitute advice. Before making legal or financial decisions you should seek advice from a professional adviser, who can take into account your specific circumstances and investment goals.
Nigel Ward is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2006, 08:03 AM   #5 (permalink)
NickM
Team InvestEd
 
Posts: 296
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney
ATO ID 2002/363 (a brief extract is available on my website under newsletters and downloads)
is the appropriate reference for a joint loan and interest deductibility. It doesnt really matter whose name is on the loan it is the purpose as Sim said that is important.

as for NIgel's comments if it was only 1 property you may struggle to justify a bookeeping expense. I dont think a partnership agreement is suitable as the IP is only in 1 name.

a job description would be necessary in order to justify paying your spouse.

NIckM
__________________
"This is a general comment only and is not advice. Before making financial decisions you should seek advice of a professional adviser"
NickM is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Some graphics originally by vBStyles.com

Copyright © 2006 Investor Education Pty Ltd (ACN 114 677 226)
Site by Hampel Group