Home | Log in | Join Now! | Blog | Contact    Subscribe to the InvestEd Forum feed (new threads) via RSS
InvestEd :: Wealth Education for Australian Investors

Your stratergie to join the Millionaires Club.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 16-08-2008, 06:40 PM   #11
The Rule of 72
 
Posts: 1,359
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne, VIC
withdrawn due to comments by mark suggesting my contribution is a waste of time and to be ignored. Please close this thread.

Last edited by crc_error; 18-08-2008 at 12:36 PM.
crc_error is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2008, 07:05 PM   #12
Banned
 
Posts: 197
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Adelaide, SA
Quote:
Originally Posted by BV View Post
CRC

I am not risking my IP equity to buy shares or funds in this environment.
I have decided that I will wait for the share markets to turn around before I reconsider changing my position.

Cheers
sooo your going to wait until the share market recovers, say 30%... that's crazy.

what would you do if the property market collapsed by 30%? would you sit on your hands and wait for it to recover, or would you snap up a few bargins? the same applies to the sharemarket.


CRC your investment strategy sounds good to me, dollar cost averaging and diversification arcoss asset classes is always a good strategy, good luck.
Young Gun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2008, 08:54 PM   #13
Member
 
Posts: 793
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Quote:
Originally Posted by crc_error View Post
The trick is HAVE A REGULAR INVESTMENT PLAN, AND DOLLAR COST AVERAGE YOUR WAY INTO THE MARKET.
Say that to the top market performers and see what they say. What's good for them is also attainable by 'mum and dad' investors. It's just a matter of doing a bit of research and buying when shares represent good value. Dollar Cost Averaging produces (if your lucky) average returns at best.

Mark
__________________
'If you're going through hell, keep going’ - Winston Churchill

'Success is not about brilliance. Success is about perseverance. Hanging in there is of far more importance than any other single factor.' - Kristine

This is a general comment only and does not constitute advice. Before making legal or financial decisions you should seek advice from a professional adviser, who can take into account your specific circumstances and investment goals.
Mark Laszczuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2008, 11:19 PM   #14
Member
 
Posts: 75
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mt Macedon, Vic
I think the $million net wealth is achievable with real estate or share-based investments - using leverage and compounding will get there. The issue that more occupies my thoughts is 'time'. If happy to let the plan mature over 20 or 30 years that should be quite achievable. If want to do it quicker, then it gets difficult. Maybe have to move from an 'investment' mindset to a 'business' mindset. Can still have traditional investments but need to work them somehow to speed up the process.

Just a couple of miscellaneous personal comments

- I wonder about the use of managed funds - they take a fee to (often) just track an index - they entice investment during good times (pretending it's their skill rather than the underlying market) then run marketing during bad times to try to retain clients. Also, investment rebalancing policies can mandate that they sell out of successful parts of the investment and buy into underperforming to reset the balance.

- A positive with managed funds can be 'value for time' - can effectively outsource/delegate the investment process so it requires very little use of your time - freeing you up for other things...

- I wonder if all advisor's really understand dollar cost averaging - it only makes sense if the thing you're averaging into is going to remain in business - can dollar cost average beautifully into a failing company as the share price reduces. I recall seeing a documentary some years ago from America where high profile advisor/broker continually recommended buying into a company - dollar cost averaging better and better - when they looked at the chart over a period of time it was on a long downtrend and the company was showing no signs of recovering.

Rgds, Ilori
ilori is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2008, 11:33 PM   #15
The Rule of 72
 
Posts: 1,359
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne, VIC
withdrawn due to comments by mark suggesting my contribution is a waste of time and to be ignored. Please close this thread.

Last edited by crc_error; 18-08-2008 at 12:36 PM.
crc_error is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2008, 11:39 PM   #16
The Rule of 72
 
Posts: 1,359
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne, VIC
withdrawn due to comments by mark suggesting my contribution is a waste of time and to be ignored. Please close this thread.

Last edited by crc_error; 18-08-2008 at 12:37 PM.
crc_error is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2008, 12:46 AM   #17
Member
 
Posts: 793
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane
Quote:
Originally Posted by crc_error View Post
Lets look at top market performers.. Warren Buffet.. now does he sell up and buy back when shares represent good value?

No he buys and holds, and then buys more when he feels he is buying at a discount.
Incorrect. WB buys when the intrinsic value of the businesses are low and sells when they are valued at way above their intrinsic value, if he beleives there are opportunities available where he can achieve a higher return. From the outside looking in, it appears to me that he is willing to sell shares in businesses that are selling well above their intrinsic value BH owns and hold cash until the right opportunity comes along, but I could be wrong.

This makes sense - why hold shares that at their current value may achieve a return of, for example 5% over the long term, when you can sell those holdings and buy shares that can achieve a potential return of say, 15%. Only with a small handful of holdings does he hold them permanently.

Let's use a rough example. Say you hold ABC and you've held them for 10 years and they're valued at this point in time at $20. At $20 they might achieve a long term return based on curent earnings of 7%. You've done your research on XYZ and you determine that based on past earnings and management and etc that at their current value of $5 they might achieve a return of 20% over the long term. Would you not sell your shares in ABC and use that money to buy XYZ?

Sure, you might say 'But that's prediction.' But isn't saying 'If I continue to hold ABC and their returns might improve' also prediction? WB does predict to a certain degree - but the prediction is reduced as much as humanly possible based on information publicly available. No one can say with absolute certainty what is going to happen in the future. So from what I've read on WB, he makes his decisions on which businesses to invest in based on what he predicts to produce the best possible returns over the long term.

I feel that this is where a lot of people tend to fail in picking businesses - they tend to get emotionally invested in their picks and don't want to admit that there ma be better opportunities out there. As Peter Lynch says in One Up On Wall Street - even the best only get it right at most 50% of the time.

Also, you state that you trade shares, which is a whole different ballgame to what WB does. You speculate on shares, whereas he invests in businesses. Note that I'm not saying his way is better than yours - just saying that your strategies are totally different, therefore there's no point in comparing the two.

Mark
__________________
'If you're going through hell, keep going’ - Winston Churchill

'Success is not about brilliance. Success is about perseverance. Hanging in there is of far more importance than any other single factor.' - Kristine

This is a general comment only and does not constitute advice. Before making legal or financial decisions you should seek advice from a professional adviser, who can take into account your specific circumstances and investment goals.
Mark Laszczuk is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2008, 12:56 AM   #18
The Rule of 72
 
Posts: 1,359
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne, VIC
withdrawn due to comments by mark suggesting my contribution is a waste of time and to be ignored. Please close this thread.

Last edited by crc_error; 18-08-2008 at 12:37 PM.
crc_error is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2008, 10:44 AM   #19
Banned
 
Posts: 197
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Adelaide, SA
I can't believe that everyone here with the exception of CRC is knocking the dollar cost averaging strategy! have you all gone mad???

yes its a pretty stupid strategy if your doing it over one particular share and that share is on a long downward trend never to recover.

but if your doing it over the market as a whole whats wrong with that?? (unless you a firm believer that markets will never go up, in that case take all your money out of the bank and go hide in the nearest cave).

It removes the risk that you've timed the market wrong and long term it helps to conservatively build wealth.

If you knew when to exactly time the top and bottom of the market you wouldn't be here, you'd be on your own private island, sipping cocktails right now.
Young Gun is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2008, 11:42 AM   #20
D&K
Member
 
Posts: 197
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Canberra
Quote:
Originally Posted by crc_error View Post
Buying only Narva is not a good idea, cause Narva will do will in a specific environment. What about the other times? ... .
CRC, you may have missed the point to my strategy. Navra, as a managed fund, is providing cashflow to supplement the shortfall created by negative gearing on property. That needs an income focussed fund, most funds are capital oriented. Hence the range of fund choices is very limited.

Like you say, keep in property for maximum leverage, but then you need cash. Navra isn't a separate growth strategy to the IPs, they're two halves of one strategy.

Dave
__________________
This is a general comment, opinion or view on experience and does not constitute advice. Spelling and grammatical errors included to add character and originality!
D&K is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Melbourne "Warren B Style" Investment Club FCF Introductions 2 17-07-2008 06:03 PM


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:40 AM.

Copyright © 2006 Investor Education Pty Ltd (ACN 114 677 226)
Site by Hampel Group