Home | Log in | Join Now! | Blog | Contact    Subscribe to the InvestEd Blog via RSS
InvestEd :: Wealth Education for Australian Investors




Welcome to InvestEd.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please:


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

How much risk is TOO much?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 21-08-2006, 08:42 AM   #1 (permalink)
Giddo
Member
 
Posts: 42
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SE Qld
How much risk is TOO much?

I need to obtain a PPOR while retaining my investments. Nice if I can do it eh?

I could put down $150k as a deposit which is free from any encumbrance.
So far so good.

Then I would get a loan for another 200k; so total value of PPOR would be $350k.
Once my loan is in place I would wish to borrow against the equity of $150k.

Say I could borrow 80% - $120k.

I could then margin lend into a income fund such as Navra; and use the income to hopefully pay the home loan of $200k balance.



My question is how much debt recycling is TOO much?

Perhaps a strategy would be to have amount in offset as backup?
PS - I could struggle to pay the entire house payment on 200k if the scheme fell over.
Any thoughts / adjustments/suggestions welcome?
Giddo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
   
 
Hide these adverts with a Free Membership
Old 21-08-2006, 09:23 AM   #2 (permalink)
Dr Lobster
Member
 
Dr Lobster's Avatar
 
Posts: 95
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: sydney nsw
I am currently considering a similar scenario except i won't be using investment income to supplement my employee derived income to pay my loan on my PPOR.

I prefer to reinvest the dividends automatically. I know this isn't the most efficient means to reinvest in terms of maximising returns, however it is the most efficient means for me due to time constraints. I cannot pick the top or the bottom of a market and over the longer term I don't believe that it will make a huge amount of difference.

When I ran the numbers on my scenario I ran a very detailed budget. It sounds obvious however this is the cornerstone of these sorts of analysis. Once I had this established I factored in interest rates at 9%. This provided my base case scaenario. I could then see how much "wiggle" room I have or to put it another way how much "Oh ****" money I had without having to dip into the cookie jar. My analysis includes tax benefits and then feeds into a set of assumptions that shows my equity and at which point in time I envisage hitting the number I need to pull the pin on the income I desire.

How much is too much ? No-one can tell you, its a matter of running numbers again and again until you are happy that the numbers are as correct as they can be, that you understand the weaknesses in the numbers you have run and then standing back and seeing if you are comfortable with the result, whether you are cutting it too fine.

The answer is in the numbers and being honest with yourself as to what you can live off. Don't stack the numbers to give you an answer that you want.
Dr Lobster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2006, 09:33 AM   #3 (permalink)
Glebe
Member
 
Posts: 930
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney, NSW
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Lobster
The answer is in the numbers and being honest with yourself as to what you can live off. Don't stack the numbers to give you an answer that you want.
But where's the fun in that?
Glebe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2006, 10:16 AM   #4 (permalink)
Dr Lobster
Member
 
Dr Lobster's Avatar
 
Posts: 95
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: sydney nsw
sleeping at night
Dr Lobster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2006, 10:18 AM   #5 (permalink)
lauries
Member
 
Posts: 12
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Brisbane, Qld
To the best of my understanding, the banks will lend on 80% of the security value. In your case that would be 80% x $350k = $280k. Less the loan of $200k gives you $80k to invest.

Of course, you can reborrow at a higher LVR, but I think you would need to look at your scenario using these figures.

Hopefully you arrive at a strategy to suit.
lauries is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2006, 01:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
See Change
Member
 
Posts: 59
Join Date: Aug 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giddo

I could then margin lend into a income fund such as Navra; and use the income to hopefully pay the home loan of $200k balance.

PS - I could struggle to pay the entire house payment on 200k if the scheme fell over.
?
What happens if you have a period of negative growth in the share market and have to fund the margin loan on your managed funds .

See Change
See Change is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2006, 01:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
Giddo
Member
 
Posts: 42
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SE Qld
Quote:
Originally Posted by lauries
To the best of my understanding, the banks will lend on 80% of the security value. In your case that would be 80% x $350k = $280k. Less the loan of $200k gives you $80k to invest.

Of course, you can reborrow at a higher LVR, but I think you would need to look at your scenario using these figures.
.
Thank you Lauries - so if i bought a home worth $400k and put in 150k; it would go like this -
400k x 80% = $320 minus the amount owed $250k leaves me with the ability to borrow back $70k

Or if I bought a home worth $300k and put in $150k it would be 300 x 80% = 240k minus the amount owed $150 leaving $90k to borrow back.

Or I could borrow 80% on the new home ($280k on the 350k home) and use the balance of my cash $80k to invest.

A lot of it is a matter of preference really eh?


Thank you v much to you Dr Lobster and Glebe for your input which pointed out something I should know but hadn't considered enough - The fact that I need to make absolutely certain I am comfy with any arrangement i put in place.

Any other experiences/advice appreciated.
Giddo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2006, 01:52 PM   #8 (permalink)
Giddo
Member
 
Posts: 42
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SE Qld
Quote:
Originally Posted by See Change
What happens if you have a period of negative growth in the share market and have to fund the margin loan on your managed funds .

See Change
Whats the name of that creek Seachange - yes that one- that the the creek I am up.

Have to factor in some safety lifeboats for this to be any good to me.
Thanks.
Giddo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2006, 01:58 PM   #9 (permalink)
Giddo
Member
 
Posts: 42
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SE Qld
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Lobster
I am currently considering a similar scenario except i won't be using investment income to supplement my employee derived income to pay my loan on my PPOR.
.....edited....
When I ran the numbers on my scenario I ran a very detailed budget. It sounds obvious however this is the cornerstone of these sorts of analysis. Once I had this established I factored in interest rates at 9%.
The answer is in the numbers and being honest with yourself as to what you can live off. Don't stack the numbers to give you an answer that you want....edited...
Thanks Doc,

Stacking the numbers sounds better to me he he.

But seriously you are right EXCEPT I disagree with running a detailed budget.

I would rather have a thorough understanding of where the figures can go wrong - a la various perverse scenarios.
I reckon working out a meticulous budget doesn't help in this.
Too many variables to b udget usually.
Thanks for you help.
Giddo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21-08-2006, 03:36 PM   #10 (permalink)
TryHard
Member
 
TryHard's Avatar
 
Posts: 831
Join Date: Aug 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Lobster
The answer is in the numbers and being honest with yourself as to what you can live off. Don't stack the numbers to give you an answer that you want.
Actually that's an excellent point ! Certain personality types (at least mine) cause people to cloud the figures to convince themselves they can do it no matter what. Doesn't always work out
__________________
Where are we going ? And what am I doing in this handbasket ??
TryHard is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Some graphics originally by vBStyles.com

Copyright © 2006 Investor Education Pty Ltd (ACN 114 677 226)
Site by Hampel Group