Home | Log in | Join Now! | Blog | Contact    Subscribe to the InvestEd Blog via RSS
InvestEd :: Wealth Education for Australian Investors


Welcome to InvestEd.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please:


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact support.

View Single Post
Old 07-12-2006, 12:24 PM   #10 (permalink)
dinky
Member
 
Posts: 9
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney
Quote:
Originally Posted by -T- View Post
This idea of "time in the market is better than timing the market" is the catchcry of the mediocre investor…. I believe
I think it does depend of what you expect from your investments. For instance, I don't expect my investments to provide the income I need to live, I want my business provides all the income I need to live and grow the investments. So, I am using real estate and shares as a medium to keep my wealth. The basic idea is money from the business go to investments.

I strong believe that both, RE and shares, will growth in the long term, so I declare myself a mediocre investor. For me average returns are greats.

I don't know which one is better, I think they are just different. RE is great because its leverage and shares are great because it's the liquidity.

Just my opinion.

Cheers
dinky is offline   Reply With Quote
 

All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Some graphics originally by vBStyles.com

Copyright © 2006 Investor Education Pty Ltd (ACN 114 677 226)
Site by Hampel Group